These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

782 related items for PubMed ID: 19212237

  • 1. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
    Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA, Zöller JE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of implant placement using a CAD/CAM surgical guide: an in vitro study.
    Nokar S, Moslehifard E, Bahman T, Bayanzadeh M, Nasirpouri F, Nokar A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Nov; 26(3):520-6. PubMed ID: 21691598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Virtual variation simulation of CAD/CAM template-guided surgeries performed on human cadavers: Part II.
    Kero T, Pettersson A, Fäldt J, Andersson M, Gillot L, Cannas B, Näsström K, Söderberg R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20620367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
    Widmann G, Keiler M, Zangerl A, Stoffner R, Longato S, Bale R, Puelacher W.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
    Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 May; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality.
    Lin YK, Yau HT, Wang IC, Zheng C, Chung KH.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):543-53. PubMed ID: 23879701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
    Barnea E, Alt I, Kolerman R, Nissan J.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL.
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A novel stereolithographic surgical guide template for planning treatment involving a mandibular dental implant.
    Nikzad S, Azari A.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 66(7):1446-54. PubMed ID: 18571029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide.
    Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1377-87. PubMed ID: 22001378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
    Fortin T, Isidori M, Bouchet H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Dec; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
    Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Dec; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.