These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

635 related items for PubMed ID: 19218557

  • 1. Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone and semitendinosus-gracilis autografts: a comparison between bioabsorbable screws and bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation.
    Volpi P, Marinoni L, Bait C, Galli M, de Girolamo L.
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 19218557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prospective evaluation of patellar tendon graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing composite bioabsorbable and allograft interference screws.
    Tecklenburg K, Burkart P, Hoser C, Rieger M, Fink C.
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Sep; 22(9):993-9. PubMed ID: 16952730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of patellar bone-tendon-bone and hamstring tendon graft methods. Part 2. Short-term evaluation of the hamstring tendon graft technique with use of the Rigidfix system].
    Musil D, Sadovský P, Filip L, Vodicka Z, Stehlík J.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005 Sep; 72(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 16194443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MRI in ACL reconstructive surgery with PDLLA bioabsorbable interference screws: evaluation of degradation and osteointegration processes of bioabsorbable screws.
    Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mocci A, Ettorre GC.
    Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 107(1-2):47-57. PubMed ID: 15031696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Tibial fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of bovine bone screw and biodegradable interference screw.
    Zheng N, Price CT, Indelicato PA, Gao B.
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Dec; 36(12):2322-7. PubMed ID: 18765676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
    Gupta A, Lattermann C, Busam M, Riff A, Bach BR, Wang VM.
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of bioabsorbable interference screws used for fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
    Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Myhr G.
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1164-9. PubMed ID: 16493172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Femoral press-fit fixation technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Preliminary report].
    Pavlik A, Hidas P, Tállay A, Berkes I.
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Dec 15; 143(50):2769-73. PubMed ID: 12583316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369].
    Stengel D, Matthes G, Seifert J, Tober V, Mutze S, Rademacher G, Ekkernkamp A, Bauwens K, Wich M, Casper D, SPOT Group.
    BMC Surg; 2005 Feb 21; 5():1. PubMed ID: 15723704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of patellar bone-tendon-bone and hamstring tendon graft methods. Part 1. Evaluation of patients treated by the patellar bone-tendon-bone graft technique].
    Sadovský P, Musil D, Filip L, Vodicka Z, Stehlík J.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005 Feb 21; 72(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 16194442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical comparison of fixation methods for patellar bone quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: absorbable cross-pins versus absorbable screws.
    Gorschewsky O, Stapf R, Geiser L, Geitner U, Neumann W.
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Dec 21; 35(12):2118-25. PubMed ID: 17932398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cyclic loading comparison between biodegradable interference screw fixation and biodegradable double cross-pin fixation of human bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts.
    Zantop T, Ruemmler M, Welbers B, Langer M, Weimann A, Petersen W.
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug 21; 21(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 16084290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws.
    Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ.
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Mar 21; 35(3):384-94. PubMed ID: 17218661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tibial tunnel widening after hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the effect of supplemental aperture fixation with autogenous bone cores.
    Schultz WR, McKissick RC, DeLee JC.
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Oct 21; 35(10):1725-30. PubMed ID: 17687123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Correlation of interference screw insertion torque with depth of placement in the tibial tunnel using a quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Phillips BB, Cain EL, Dlabach JA, Azar FM.
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Dec 21; 20(10):1026-9. PubMed ID: 15592230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up.
    Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K.
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec 21; 34(12):1933-40. PubMed ID: 16923826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a comparison of graft type based on age and Tegner activity level.
    Barrett AM, Craft JA, Replogle WH, Hydrick JM, Barrett GR.
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct 21; 39(10):2194-8. PubMed ID: 21784999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
    MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF.
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar 21; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.