These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 19219690

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, Van de Heyning P.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Niewiarowicz M, Stieler O.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005 Jan; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cochlear implant patients' speech understanding in background noise: effect of mismatch between electrode assigned frequencies and perceived pitch.
    Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Parrilla C, Paludetti G.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Aug; 124(8):828-34. PubMed ID: 20202276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D, Eiler CL, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.