These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 19225814

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent.
    Behr M, Hansmann M, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 19225814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
    Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E, Celik EU, Turkun M.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Feb; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.
    Trajtenberg CP, Caram SJ, Kiat-amnuay S.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Feb; 33(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 18666496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T, Abe T, Ito Y, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Watson TF, Foxton RM.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Feb; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, Roggendorf MJ.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of inlay ceramic systems luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Uludag B, Yucedag E, Sahin V.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 25264550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG, González-Lopez S, Bolaños-Carmona V, Maurício PJ, Félix SA, Carvalho PA.
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Oct; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
    Schenke F, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Federlin M.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jan; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Jan; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
    Peumans M, Voet M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):739-50. PubMed ID: 22707232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
    Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, Hellwig E.
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
    Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Appelt A, Lohbauer U, Naumann M, Roggendorf MJ.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S, Anthofer T, Fritzsch M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Federlin M.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Nov; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
    Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Apr; 12(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20157666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.