These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

528 related items for PubMed ID: 19231566

  • 1. Making an implant-level impression using solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a clinical report.
    Selecman AM, Wicks RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19231566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Mar; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB, Hong HH, Tsai TP, Shen YF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Jul; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique.
    Kavadia V, Kourtis S, Zoidis P, Sarafianou A.
    Gen Dent; 2019 May; 67(3):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 31199752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.