These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 19232347

  • 41. Factors affecting the yield of brush cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary cancers.
    Parsi MA, Deepinder F, Lopez R, Stevens T, Dodig M, Zuccaro G.
    Pancreas; 2011 Jan; 40(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 20871478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures.
    Uehara H, Tatsumi K, Masuda E, Kato M, Kizu T, Ishida T, Takakura R, Takano Y, Nakaizumi A, Ishikawa O, Takenaka A.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jul; 70(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 19249043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Meagher S, Yusoff I, Kennedy W, Martel M, Adam V, Barkun A.
    Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Cost utility of ERCP-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    Njei B, McCarty TR, Varadarajulu S, Navaneethan U.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Apr; 85(4):773-781.e10. PubMed ID: 27590963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Development of a multivariate model to predict the likelihood of carcinoma in patients with indeterminate peripheral lung nodules after a nondiagnostic bronchoscopic evaluation.
    Voss JS, Iqbal S, Jenkins SM, Henry MR, Clayton AC, Jett JR, Kipp BR, Halling KC, Maldonado F.
    Hum Pathol; 2014 Jan; 45(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 24139213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
    Marín-Aguilera M, Mengual L, Ribal MJ, Musquera M, Ars E, Villavicencio H, Algaba F, Alcaraz A.
    Eur Urol; 2007 Feb; 51(2):409-15; discussion 415. PubMed ID: 17010508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Comparison of ThinPrep UroCyte and cytospin slide preparations for gastrointestinal specimens: evaluation and retrospective performance review.
    Smith GD, Chadwick BE, Adler DG, Bentz JS.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 38(12):902-12. PubMed ID: 21104738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
    Krishnamurthy S, Katz RL, Shumate A, Strohlein K, Khanna A, Tucker SL, Raijman I, Lahoti S.
    Cancer; 2001 Jun 25; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. The Role of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Pancreatobiliary Brushing Cytology: A Large Retrospective Review with Histologic Correlation.
    Khan J, la Sancha C, Saad M, Alkashash A, Ullah A, Alruwaii F, Velasquez Zarate L, Cramer HM, Wu HH.
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Oct 14; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 36292175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.