These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

408 related items for PubMed ID: 19237061

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A case of diabetic mastopathy with multiple lesions mimicking breast cancer.
    Utada Y, Watanabe T, Kajiwara T, Shimizu T, Imamura H, Watanabe O, Kinoshita J, Okabe T, Kimura K, Hirano A, Ogawa K.
    Breast Cancer; 2003; 10(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 14634518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, Dominelli V, Cagioli S, Karatasiou A, Pronio A, Kirchin MA, Passariello R.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
    Tokuda Y, Kuriyama K, Nakamoto A, Choi S, Yutani K, Kunitomi Y, Haneda T, Kawai M, Masuda N, Takeda M, Nakamura H.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Jul; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Diabetic mastopathy: a case report.
    Giunta A, Vigneri R, Manusia M, Squatrito S, Tomaselli L.
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2003 Jul; 26(7):683-5. PubMed ID: 14594123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions.
    Kul S, Eyuboglu I, Cansu A, Alhan E.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 24923252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Appropriate imaging work-up of palpable breast masses. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Evans WP, Mendelson E, Bassett L, Böhm-Vélez M, Cardenosa G, D'Orsi C, Monsees B, Thurmond A, Goldstein S.
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():961-4. PubMed ID: 11037523
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Fat necrosis of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Chala LF, de Barros N, de Camargo Moraes P, Endo E, Kim SJ, Pincerato KM, Carvalho FM, Cerri GG.
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2004 Jun; 33(3):106-26. PubMed ID: 15215818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.