These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

384 related items for PubMed ID: 19246193

  • 1. Reduction in excess sludge production in a dairy wastewater treatment plant via nozzle-cavitation treatment: case study of an on-farm wastewater treatment plant.
    Hirooka K, Asano R, Yokoyama A, Okazaki M, Sakamoto A, Nakai Y.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jun; 100(12):3161-6. PubMed ID: 19246193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Treating both wastewater and excess sludge with an innovative process.
    He SB, Wang BZ, Wang L, Jiang YF.
    J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Nov; 15(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 14758891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A strategy in wastewater treatment process for significant reduction of excess sludge production.
    Shiota N, Akashi A, Hasegawa S.
    Water Sci Technol; 2002 Nov; 45(12):127-34. PubMed ID: 12201093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of chemical sludge disintegration on the performances of wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor.
    Oh YK, Lee KR, Ko KB, Yeom IT.
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2665-71. PubMed ID: 17451782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J, Petrović M, Barceló D.
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Feasibility study to upgrade a textile wastewater treatment plant by a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor for effluent reuse.
    Malpei F, Bonomo L, Rozzi A.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 Feb; 47(10):33-9. PubMed ID: 12862214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. One-year operation of single household membrane bioreactor plant.
    Matulova Z, Hlavinek P, Drtil M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 61(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 20057108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Zero Nuisance Piggeries: long-term performance of MBR (membrane bioreactor) for dilute swine wastewater treatment using submerged membrane bioreactor in semi-industrial scale.
    Prado N, Ochoa J, Amrane A.
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1549-58. PubMed ID: 19136138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.
    Fenu A, Guglielmi G, Jimenez J, Spèrandio M, Saroj D, Lesjean B, Brepols C, Thoeye C, Nopens I.
    Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Anaerobic stabilisation of sludge produced during municipal wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation.
    Hutnan M, Drtil M, Kalina A.
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Apr 17; 131(1-3):163-9. PubMed ID: 16297548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Savings with upgraded performance through improved activated sludge denitrification in the combined activated sludge-biofilter system of the Southpest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
    Jobbágy A, Tardy GM, Palkó G, Benáková A, Krhutková O, Wanner J.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008 Apr 17; 57(8):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18469403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Using acoustic cavitation to improve the bio-activity of activated sludge.
    Zhang G, Zhang P, Gao J, Chen Y.
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar 17; 99(5):1497-502. PubMed ID: 17379507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Ramphao M, Wentzel MC, Merritt R, Ekama GA, Young T, Buckley CA.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar 20; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative study of phenol and cyanide containing wastewater in CSTR and SBR activated sludge reactors.
    Papadimitriou CA, Samaras P, Sakellaropoulos GP.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan 20; 100(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 18650084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.