These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

422 related items for PubMed ID: 19247159

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y.
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
    Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kröger H, Viinamäki H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov 01; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
    Castro-Menéndez M, Bravo-Ricoy JA, Casal-Moro R, Hernández-Blanco M, Jorge-Barreiro FJ.
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul 01; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T, Watanabe K, Fujita N, Iwanami A, Hosogane N, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct 01; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Sakamoto A, Yato Y, Harada T, Mikami Y, Hase H, Kubo T.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr 15; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?
    Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1590-9. PubMed ID: 19521272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years.
    Chang Y, Singer DE, Wu YA, Keller RB, Atlas SJ.
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 May 01; 53(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 15877553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Outcomes of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in mature adults: posterolateral non-instrument-assisted lumbar decompression and fusion.
    Hamilton DK, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Sansur C, Shaffrey CI, Oskouian R, Jane JA.
    Surg Neurol; 2008 May 01; 69(5):457-61; discussion 461-2. PubMed ID: 18207557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.