These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
2800 related items for PubMed ID: 19249082
1. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Renaud MC, Plante M, Roy M. Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, De Petrillo D, Covens A. Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, Soliman PT. Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 19944451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Sert B, Abeler V. Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 20153886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Pellegrino A, Vizza E, Fruscio R, Villa A, Corrado G, Villa M, Dell'Anna T, Vitobello D. Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer: a case series and literature review. Pareja F R, Ramirez PT, Borrero F M, Angel C G. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 18829092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. Puntambekar SP, Palep RJ, Puntambekar SS, Wagh GN, Patil AM, Rayate NV, Agarwal GA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 17980327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]