These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 19250600

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings.
    Hoffmann MB, Flechner JJ.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 18054278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Hierarchical decomposition of dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Maddess T, James AC, Ruseckaite R, Bowman EA.
    Vis Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 23(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 17020626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of eccentricity on pattern-pulse multifocal VEP.
    Klistorner AI, Graham SL.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 110(2-3):209-18. PubMed ID: 16328929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of selective attention on pattern-specific visual evoked potentials.
    Czigler I, Tölgyesi M.
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1983 Mar; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 6858589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Low- and high-frequency evoked responses following pattern reversal stimuli: a MEG study supported by fMRI constraint.
    Perfetti B, Franciotti R, Della Penna S, Ferretti A, Caulo M, Romani GL, Onofrj M.
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr 15; 35(3):1152-67. PubMed ID: 17337346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Low-luminance contrast stimulation is optimal for early detection of glaucoma using multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H, Klistorner A, Grigg J, Graham SL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun 01; 52(6):3744-50. PubMed ID: 21296828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Steady-state multifocal visual evoked potential (ssmfVEP) using dartboard stimulation as a possible tool for objective visual field assessment.
    Horn FK, Selle F, Hohberger B, Kremers J.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb 01; 254(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 26553198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern-reversal visual-evoked potentials.
    Kurita-Tashima S, Tobimatsu S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M, Kato M.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Jul 01; 33(8):2423-8. PubMed ID: 1634339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sensitivity to stimulus onset and offset in the S-cone pathway.
    Racheva K, Vassilev A.
    Vision Res; 2008 Apr 01; 48(9):1125-36. PubMed ID: 18343479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Eccentricity-dependent changes in local onset and offset responses in patients with progressive cone dystrophy.
    Holopigian K, Wynn P, Seiple W, Carr RE, Hood DC.
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug 01; 47(17):2297-304. PubMed ID: 17614114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ, Strugstad EC, Sehatpour P, Molholm S, Pasieka W, Schroeder CE, McCourt ME.
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep 01; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.