These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

560 related items for PubMed ID: 19254586

  • 1. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C, Verma A, Soni A, Thusoo M, Mahajan VK, Verma S.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
    Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM, Dow ML, Lohse CM, Tessmer-Tuck JA.
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized trial comparing skin closure in cesarean section: interrupted suture with nylon vs subcuticular suture with No '1' polyfilament.
    Shrestha A, Napit J, Neupane B, Sedhai LB.
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):240-3. PubMed ID: 24908523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
    Feese CA, Johnson S, Jones E, Lambers DS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A prospective, randomized comparison of skin adhesive and subcuticular suture for closure of pediatric hernia incisions: cost and cosmetic considerations.
    Brown JK, Campbell BT, Drongowski RA, Alderman AK, Geiger JD, Teitelbaum DH, Quinn J, Coran AG, Hirschl RB.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Jul; 44(7):1418-22. PubMed ID: 19573672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples.
    Fisher DA, Bengero LL, Clapp BC, Burgess M.
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep 07; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct 07; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J, Khalifeh A, Pettker C, Berghella V, Dabbish N, Mackeen AD.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov 07; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG, Summitt RL, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep 07; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.