These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
223 related items for PubMed ID: 19261554
1. XPS, AES and SEM analysis of recent dental implants. Kang BS, Sul YT, Oh SJ, Lee HJ, Albrektsson T. Acta Biomater; 2009 Jul; 5(6):2222-9. PubMed ID: 19261554 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Jarmar T, Palmquist A, Brånemark R, Hermansson L, Engqvist H, Thomsen P. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness. Sul YT, Byon E, Wennerberg A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Mar; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants. Fandridis J, Papadopoulos T. Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18332762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Sul YT, Jönsson J, Yoon GS, Johansson C. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Vazquez L, Park YJ, Sammartino G, Bernard JP. J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):525-42. PubMed ID: 21728785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ, Aparicio C, Manero JM, Padros A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A macro- and nanostructure evaluation of a novel dental implant. Tetè S, Mastrangelo F, Traini T, Vinci R, Sammartino G, Marenzi G, Gherlone E. Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 18784531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs. De Maeztu MA, Braceras I, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 18339518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW, Kim HK, Kim YJ, An CH, Hanawa T. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vitro Bioactivity Test of Real Dental Implants According to ISO 23317. Kolafová M, Šťovíček J, Strnad J, Zemek J, Dybal J. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017 Jul; 32(6):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 29140368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface Modifications of Commercial Dental Implant Systems: An Overview. Sivaswamy V, Bahl V. J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2023 Jul; 33(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 36734929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface characteristics and cell adhesion: a comparative study of four commercial dental implants. Liu R, Lei T, Dusevich V, Yao X, Liu Y, Walker MP, Wang Y, Ye L. J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):641-51. PubMed ID: 23725293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) and XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) study of titanium implant surfaces coated with anodic titanium-oxide layer]. Suba C, Velich N, Vida G, Kovács L, Kiss G, Szabó G. Fogorv Sz; 2003 Oct; 96(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 14635492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphology and chemical characterization of Ti surfaces modified for biomedical applications. Lewandowska M, Roguska A, Pisarek M, Polak B, Janik-Czachor M, Kurzydłowski KJ. Biomol Eng; 2007 Nov; 24(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 17768086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Surface modifications of titanium implant material with excimer laser for more effective osseointegration]. Pelsoczi KI, Bereznai M, Tóth Z, Turzó K, Radnai M, Bor Z, Fazekas A. Fogorv Sz; 2004 Dec; 97(6):231-7. PubMed ID: 15690914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative surface microanalysis of failed Brånemark implants. Aparicio C, Olivé J. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992 Dec; 7(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 1398830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]