These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

598 related items for PubMed ID: 19267272

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
    Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, Weiss HD.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Single-incision technique for tunneled central venous access.
    Contractor SG, Phatak TD, Klyde D, Gonzales S, Sadowski S, Bhagat N.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Aug; 20(8):1052-8. PubMed ID: 19647183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
    Kluge A, Stroh H, Wagner D, Rauber K.
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience.
    Cil BE, Canyiğit M, Peynircioğlu B, Hazirolan T, Carkaci S, Cekirge S, Balkanci F.
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2006 Jun; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16752357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.
    Teichgräber UK, Streitparth F, Cho CH, Benter T, Gebauer B.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
    Unal AE, Bayar S, Arat M, Ilhan O.
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Use of the right external jugular vein as the preferred access site when the right internal jugular vein is not usable.
    Cho SK, Shin SW, Do YS, Park KB, Choo SW, Choo IW.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 May; 17(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 16687748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
    D'Angelo F, Ramacciato G, Caramitti A, Aurello P, Lauro S, Bordin F, Della Casa U.
    Minerva Chir; 1997 May; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.