These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


598 related items for PubMed ID: 19267272

  • 61. Experience with subcutaneous infusion ports in three hundred patients.
    Brothers TE, Von Moll LK, Niederhuber JE, Roberts JA, Walker-Andrews S, Ensminger WD.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Apr; 166(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 3127896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. [Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) - related complications in colorectal cancer patients].
    Kameyama H, Yamazaki T, Maeda C, Akamatsu M, Yokoyama N, Kuwabara S, Otani T, Katayanagi N.
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2010 Mar; 37(3):453-5. PubMed ID: 20332682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Ultrasound-guided insertion of subclavian venous access ports.
    Brooks AJ, Alfredson M, Pettigrew B, Morris DL.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Jan; 87(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 15720903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. External jugular venous catheterization with a Groshong catheter for central venous access.
    Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Kubota K.
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jul 01; 98(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 18452215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Outcomes of surgical and radiologic placed implantable central venous access ports.
    Sticca RP, Dewing BD, Harris JD.
    Am J Surg; 2009 Dec 01; 198(6):829-33. PubMed ID: 19969137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.
    Dillon PA, Foglia RP.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep 01; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Subclavian vein versus arm vein for totally implantable central venous port for patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparative analysis.
    Akahane A, Sone M, Ehara S, Kato K, Tanaka R, Nakasato T.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec 01; 34(6):1222-9. PubMed ID: 21127864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].
    Lenhart M, Schätzler S, Manke C, Strotzer M, Seitz J, Gmeinwieser J, Völk M, Zorger N, Feuerbach S, Herold T, Paetzel C.
    Rofo; 2010 Jan 01; 182(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19536729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. Malposition of central venous catheters. Incidence, management and preventive practices.
    Muhm M, Sunder-Plassmann G, Apsner R, Pernerstorfer T, Rajek A, Lassnigg A, Prokesch R, Derfler K, Druml W.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1997 Jun 06; 109(11):400-5. PubMed ID: 9226858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. Totally implantable subpectoral vs. subcutaneous port systems in children with malignant diseases.
    Rouzrokh M, Shamsian BS, KhaleghNejad Tabari A, Mahmoodi M, Kouranlo J, Manafzadeh G, Arzanian MT, Fallah F, Anoush M, Abdollah Gorji F.
    Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jul 06; 12(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 19566357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Long-term clinical outcomes of the single-incision technique for implantation of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein.
    Seo TS, Song MG, Kim JS, Choi CW, Seo JH, Oh SC, Kang EJ, Lee JK, Lee SY.
    J Vasc Access; 2017 Jul 14; 18(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 28665466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.
    Ahn SJ, Kim HC, Chung JW, An SB, Yin YH, Jae HJ, Park JH.
    Korean J Radiol; 2012 Jul 14; 13(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 22563269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75. Internal jugular versus subclavian vein catheterization for central venous catheterization in orthotopic liver transplantation.
    Torgay A, Pirat A, Candan S, Zeyneloglu P, Arslan G, Haberal M.
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Sep 14; 37(7):3171-3. PubMed ID: 16213340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients.
    Samaras P, Dold S, Braun J, Kestenholz P, Breitenstein S, Imhof A, Renner C, Stenner-Liewen F, Pestalozzi BC.
    Oncology; 2008 Sep 14; 74(3-4):237-44. PubMed ID: 18716418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Modification of the right subclavian vein catheterization and its anatomic basis and techniques.
    Luo GH, Li WJ, Zhong SZ, Li ZH, Fang J.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2005 Apr 20; 118(8):645-53. PubMed ID: 15899119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.
    Schenck M, Schneider T, Rübben H, Eisenhardt A.
    World J Urol; 2012 Jun 20; 30(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21874511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
    Schuman E, Ragsdale J.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr 20; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Safe techniques for inserting the hickman catheter in pediatric patients.
    Masumoto K, Uesugi T, Nagata K, Takada N, Taguchi S, Ogita K, Yamanouchi T, Taguchi T, Suita S.
    Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2006 Apr 20; 23(7):531-40. PubMed ID: 16928648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.