These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 1926860

  • 1. Abortion 'gag' rule.
    Notkin H.
    West J Med; 1991 Aug; 155(2):191. PubMed ID: 1926860
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB.
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA.
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Gagging the clinics.
    Smolowe J.
    Time; 1991 Jun 03; 137(22):16-7. PubMed ID: 10111508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Chastity Act: government manipulation of abortion information and the First Amendment.
    Benshoof J.
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun 03; 101(8):1916-37. PubMed ID: 10288540
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Law, medicine, and the "gag rule".
    Ball JR.
    Ann Intern Med; 1991 Sep 01; 115(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 1863032
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. "Rust v. Sullivan".
    Rhodes AM.
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991 Sep 01; 16(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 1749321
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Refusal clause seen as threat to reproductive health, gag on information.
    Krisberg K.
    Nations Health; 2005 Feb 01; 35(1):1, 10. PubMed ID: 15810206
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Free speech denied. 'Gag Rule' upheld as constitutional.
    Daugherty AN.
    Tenn Nurse; 1991 Aug 01; 54(4):25. PubMed ID: 1873296
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul 01; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.
    Mariner WK.
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb 01; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD.
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Aug 01; (257):9-36. PubMed ID: 11066592
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.