These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

208 related items for PubMed ID: 19269669

  • 1. The fate of selected micropollutants in a single-house MBR.
    Abegglen C, Joss A, McArdell CS, Fink G, Schlüsener MP, Ternes TA, Siegrist H.
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2036-46. PubMed ID: 19269669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J, Petrović M, Barceló D.
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R, Lesjean B, Adam C, Buisson H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 Feb; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S, Petrovic M, Barceló D.
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H, Weiss S, Reemtsma T, Vereecken J, Müller J, Knepper T, Rörden O, Gonzalez S, Barcelo D, Dolores Hernando M.
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E, Ernst M, Godehardt M, Hein A, Herr J, Kazner C, Melin T, Cikurel H, Aharoni A, Messalem R, Brenner A, Jekel M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2011 Feb; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H, Van Roy S, Dotremont C, Miller J, Knepper T.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004 Feb; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biological nutrient removal in a small-scale MBR treating household wastewater.
    Abegglen C, Ospelt M, Siegrist H.
    Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):338-46. PubMed ID: 17707877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment.
    Joss A, Keller E, Alder AC, Göbel A, McArdell CS, Ternes T, Siegrist H.
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3139-52. PubMed ID: 16043210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The removal and degradation of pharmaceutical compounds during membrane bioreactor treatment.
    Schröder HF, Tambosi JL, Sena RF, Moreira RF, José HJ, Pinnekamp J.
    Water Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 65(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22339017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review.
    Santos A, Judd S.
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 20082004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Removal of native coliphages and coliform bacteria from municipal wastewater by various wastewater treatment processes: implications to water reuse.
    Zhang K, Farahbakhsh K.
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2816-24. PubMed ID: 17449083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. One-year operation of single household membrane bioreactor plant.
    Matulova Z, Hlavinek P, Drtil M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 61(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 20057108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme.
    Joss A, Zabczynski S, Göbel A, Hoffmann B, Löffler D, McArdell CS, Ternes TA, Thomsen A, Siegrist H.
    Water Res; 2006 May; 40(8):1686-96. PubMed ID: 16620900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants.
    Clara M, Strenn B, Gans O, Martinez E, Kreuzinger N, Kroiss H.
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4797-807. PubMed ID: 16242170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
    Siegrist H, Joss A.
    Water Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.