These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

283 related items for PubMed ID: 19271863

  • 1. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.
    Masson ME, Rotello CM.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):509-27. PubMed ID: 19271863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.
    Jang Y, Wallsten TS, Huber DE.
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy and stability of metacognitive monitoring: a new measure.
    Cheng CM.
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):715-32. PubMed ID: 20805594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. New improved gamma: Enhancing the accuracy of Goodman-Kruskal's gamma using ROC curves.
    Higham PA, Higham DP.
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):108-125. PubMed ID: 30264365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory.
    Kroll NE, Yonelinas AP, Dobbins IG, Frederick CM.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):241-54. PubMed ID: 12049242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
    Tussing AA, Greene RL.
    Am J Psychol; 2001 Jun; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR, Sprenger A.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA, Perfect TJ, Bruno D.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL, Leboe JP.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Divided attention at encoding: effect on feeling-of-knowing.
    Sacher M, Taconnat L, Souchay C, Isingrini M.
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):754-61. PubMed ID: 19423362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.
    Yonelinas AP, Parks CM.
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):800-32. PubMed ID: 17723031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect.
    Dube C, Rotello CM, Heit E.
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):831-63. PubMed ID: 20658855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Wavelet modelling of collinearity judgment error.
    Greene E, Ogden RT.
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):189-210. PubMed ID: 17535478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition.
    Bröder A, Schütz J.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Recognition memory: a review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them.
    Malmberg KJ.
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Dec; 57(4):335-84. PubMed ID: 18485339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The role of metacognitive knowledge in recollection rejection.
    Lampinen JM, Arnal JD.
    Am J Psychol; 2009 Dec; 122(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 19353930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cognitive science and the law.
    Busey TA, Loftus GR.
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 17270486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Do recognition and priming index a unitary knowledge base? Comment on Shanks et al. (2003).
    Rünger D, Nagy G, Frensch PA.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):572-85. PubMed ID: 19271870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. How many response options? A study of remember-know testing procedures.
    Bruno D, Rutherford A.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 20137771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Polychotomization of continuous variables in regression models based on the overall C index.
    Tsuruta H, Bax L.
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Dec 14; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17169154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.