These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

111 related items for PubMed ID: 1927321

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [A comparison of central visual field measurement by automated perimetry in optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis and of unknown etiology].
    Fujimoto N.
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 May; 93(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 2801361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of automated perimetry and pattern visually evoked cortical potentials in optic neuritis.
    Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul; 69(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 3048945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the optic neuritis treatment trial.
    Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 128(5):543-53. PubMed ID: 10577521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of number of test points and size of test field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E.
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Jun; 70(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 1636391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Regional threshold contrast sensitivity within the central visual field in optic neuritis.
    Plant GT, Hess RF.
    Brain; 1987 Apr; 110 ( Pt 2)():489-515. PubMed ID: 3567533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of visual acuity and automated perimetry findings in patients with neuromyelitis optica or multiple sclerosis after single or multiple attacks of optic neuritis.
    Fernandes DB, Ramos Rde I, Falcochio C, Apóstolos-Pereira S, Callegaro D, Monteiro ML.
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 32(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 22157535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Results of static perimetry in subclinical optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis].
    Mauguière F, Perret-Magloire E.
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1983 Jun; 139(12):745-52. PubMed ID: 6665389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Visual field profile of optic neuritis. One-year follow-up in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.
    Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 112(7):946-53. PubMed ID: 8031275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects.
    Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS.
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Apr; 98(4):485-95; discussion 495-6. PubMed ID: 2052302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.