These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

439 related items for PubMed ID: 19275318

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The clinical utility of expressing hearing thresholds in terms of the forward-going sound pressure wave.
    Withnell RH, Jeng PS, Parent P, Levitt H.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):522-30. PubMed ID: 24825368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.
    Lewis JD, McCreery RW, Neely ST, Stelmachowicz PG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3114-24. PubMed ID: 20000925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reference zero for the calibration of air-conduction audiometric equipment using 'tone bursts' as test signals.
    Fedtke T, Richter U.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17365049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A, Harford E, Lidén G, Ringdahl A, Dahlberg AK.
    Ear Hear; 1983 Jan; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea.
    Gan RZ, Reeves BP, Wang X.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2180-95. PubMed ID: 17882549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Shera CA, Peake WT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. High frequency Bekesy audiometry. I: equipment and calibration.
    Gauz MT, Brey RH, Ahroon WA.
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 7349307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal.
    Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9821338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.