These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 19277672

  • 1. Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Uotani K, Watanabe Y, Higashi M, Nakazawa T, Kono AK, Hori Y, Fukuda T, Kanzaki S, Yamada N, Itoh T, Sugimura K, Naito H.
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):2060-5. PubMed ID: 19277672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Thomas C, Korn A, Ketelsen D, Danz S, Tsifikas I, Claussen CD, Ernemann U, Heuschmid M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1590-5. PubMed ID: 20489101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M, Ramachandran J, Vittoria de Martini I, Wegener S, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Krauss B, Valavanis A, Alkadhi H, Winklhofer S.
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
    Chen Y, Xue HD, Jin ZY, Liu W, Sun H, Wang X, Zhao WM, Wang Y, Mu WB.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dual Energy Computed Tomography of Internal Carotid Artery: A Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal, Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Qu H, Gao Y, Li M, Zhai S, Zhang M, Lu J.
    Front Neurol; 2020 Apr; 11():621202. PubMed ID: 33633659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Watanabe Y, Uotani K, Nakazawa T, Higashi M, Yamada N, Hori Y, Kanzaki S, Fukuda T, Itoh T, Naito H.
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Apr; 19(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 19002466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dual energy CTA of the carotid bifurcation: advantage of plaque subtraction for assessment of grade of the stenosis and morphology.
    Korn A, Bender B, Thomas C, Danz S, Fenchel M, Nägele T, Heuschmid M, Ernemann U, Hauser TK.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e120-5. PubMed ID: 20833492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, Railo M, Valanne L.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A, Bender B, Brodoefel H, Hauser TK, Danz S, Ernemann U, Thomas C.
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Carotid computed tomography angiography with automated bone suppression: a comparative study between dual energy and bone subtraction techniques.
    Lell MM, Kramer M, Klotz E, Villablanca P, Ruehm SG.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):322-8. PubMed ID: 19363448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of dual-energy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone-subtraction CT angiography.
    Deng K, Liu C, Ma R, Sun C, Wang XM, Ma ZT, Sun XL.
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 19348851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses.
    Meyer BC, Werncke T, Hopfenmüller W, Raatschen HJ, Wolf KJ, Albrecht T.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):414-22. PubMed ID: 18963674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography of the Head and Neck With Single-Source Computed Tomography: A New Technical (Split Filter) Approach for Bone Removal.
    Kaemmerer N, Brand M, Hammon M, May M, Wuest W, Krauss B, Uder M, Lell MM.
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 27187046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, Zhang ZL, Wang HZ, Zhao YE, Chai X, Zhou CS, Lu GM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA.
    Lv P, Lin J, Guo D, Liu H, Tang X, Fu C, Hu J.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):2360-5. PubMed ID: 25104291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C.
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Overestimation of carotid stenosis on CTA - Real world experience.
    Horev A, Honig A, Cohen JE, Goldbart A, Dizitzer Y, Star M, Gomori JM, Zlotnik Y, Ifergane G, Borodetsky V, Shelef I, Leker RR.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 85():36-40. PubMed ID: 33581787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.