These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
506 related items for PubMed ID: 19287352
1. Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study. Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Stulik J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L, Kucera R, Vyskocil T, Steudel WI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr 01; 34(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 19287352 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Monosegmental spinal fusion: ventral cervical plates-- dynamic or static joint stability?]. Beck M. Z Orthop Unfall; 2009 Apr 01; 147(4):409. PubMed ID: 19693732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of fixed-hole and slotted-hole dynamic plates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Hong SW, Lee SH, Khoo LT, Yoon SH, Holly LT, Shamie AN, Wang JC. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb 01; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20051923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fusion and failure following anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: 6-months results of a multi-centric, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Stulik J, Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L, Kucera R, Vyskocil T, Steudel WI. Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct 01; 16(10):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17684777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic plates in anterior cervical fusion surgery: graft settling and cervical alignment. Ghahreman A, Rao PJ, Ferch RD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1567-71. PubMed ID: 19564766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification. Park Y, Maeda T, Cho W, Riew KD. Spine J; 2010 Mar 01; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bioresorbable and titanium plates in cervical spinal fusion: early radiologic and clinical results. Nabhan A, Ishak B, Steimer O, Zimmer A, Pitzen T, Steudel WI, Pape D. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May 01; 22(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 19412016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Barsa P, Suchomel P. Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep 01; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum implant: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fernández-Fairen M, Sala P, Dufoo M, Ballester J, Murcia A, Merzthal L. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar 01; 33(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 18317188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Nakamura T. J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Sep 01; 15(9):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18653347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term comparison of cervical fusion with static and dynamic plating using computerized motion analysis. Goldberg G, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Wharton N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun 01; 32(13):E371-5. PubMed ID: 17545900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Oh MC, Zhang HY, Park JY, Kim KS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr 01; 34(7):692-6. PubMed ID: 19333101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Surg Neurol; 2004 Nov 01; 62(5):378-85, discussion 385-6. PubMed ID: 15518835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lieu AS, Lee KS, Kuo TH, Hwang YF, Su YF, Howng SL. J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep 01; 1(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 15347001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Samartzis D, Shen FH, Lyon C, Phillips M, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Spine J; 2004 Sep 01; 4(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 15541695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior cervical microdiscectomy with or without fusion. Oktenoglu T, Cosar M, Ozer AF, Iplikcioglu C, Sasani M, Canbulat N, Bavbek C, Sarioglu AC. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul 01; 20(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 17607101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. Sasso RC, Best NM. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb 01; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article. Njoku I, Alimi M, Leng LZ, Shin BJ, James AR, Bhangoo S, Tsiouris AJ, Härtl R. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct 01; 21(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 25105338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression. Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F. J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar 01; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of plate position on clinical outcome after anterior cervical spine surgery. Ipsen BJ, Kim DH, Jenis LG, Tromanhauser SG, Banco RJ. Spine J; 2007 Mar 01; 7(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 17998122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]