These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

358 related items for PubMed ID: 19297051

  • 1. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
    Aarup LR, Nahum AE, Zacharatou C, Juhler-Nøttrup T, Knöös T, Nyström H, Specht L, Wieslander E, Korreman SS.
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
    Hasenbalg F, Neuenschwander H, Mini R, Born EJ.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul 07; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I, Ahmad S.
    Med Dosim; 2013 Jul 07; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Validation of Varian's AAA algorithm with focus on lung treatments.
    Rønde HS, Hoffmann L.
    Acta Oncol; 2009 Jul 07; 48(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 18803058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water.
    Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Vanetti E, Clivio A, Cozzi L.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar 21; 51(6):1421-38. PubMed ID: 16510953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX, Cygler JE, Yu CW, Kalach NI, Daskalov G.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Fix MK, Manser P, Frei D, Volken W, Mini R, Born EJ.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct 07; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
    Ottosson RO, Karlsson A, Behrens CF.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug 21; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.