These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 19302737

  • 1. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
    Sun XG, Ma SQ, Zhang JX, Wu M.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb 20; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Lu HX, Chen YX, Ni J, Wan XY, Lü WG, Xie X.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar 20; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
    Murta EF, Resende AV, Souza MA, Adad SJ, Salum R.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov 20; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
    Maluf PJ, Adad SJ, Murta EF.
    Tumori; 2004 Nov 20; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
    Park JY, Lee SM, Yoo CW, Kang S, Park SY, Seo SS.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct 20; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
    Hefler LA, Polterauer S, Schneitter A, Concin N, Hofstetter G, Bentz E, Leipold H, Tempfer C, Reinthaller A.
    Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb 20; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
    Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct 20; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Wong AS, Li WH, Cheung TH.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr 20; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
    Giray B, Kabaca-Kocakusak C, Guray-Uzun M, Akis S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr 20; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
    Chang DY, Cheng WF, Torng PL, Chen RJ, Huang SC.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct 20; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.