These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


132 related items for PubMed ID: 19306317

  • 1. Landmark-based software for anatomical measurements: a precision study.
    Forsberg A, Kullberg J, Agartz I, Ahlström H, Johansson L, Henriksson KM.
    Clin Anat; 2009 May; 22(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 19306317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Image-guided dissection of human white matter tracts as a new method of modern neuroanatomical training.
    Skadorwa T, Kunicki J, Nauman P, Ciszek B.
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2009 Aug; 68(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 19722156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM, Swennen GR, Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Schutyser FA, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A morphometric magnetic resonance method for measuring cranial, facial and brain characteristics for application to schizophrenia: part 1.
    Henriksson KM, Kelly BD, Lane A, Hult R, McNeil TF, Agartz I.
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Oct 30; 147(2-3):173-86. PubMed ID: 16952447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Anatomical phenotyping in the brain and skull of a mutant mouse by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
    Nieman BJ, Flenniken AM, Adamson SL, Henkelman RM, Sled JG.
    Physiol Genomics; 2006 Jan 12; 24(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 16410543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A pilot study of facial, cranial and brain MRI morphometry in men with schizophrenia: part 2.
    Henriksson KM, Wickstrom K, Maltesson N, Ericsson A, Karlsson J, Lindgren F, Astrom K, McNeil TF, Agartz I.
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Oct 30; 147(2-3):187-95. PubMed ID: 16949799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fully automatic identification of AC and PC landmarks on brain MRI using scene analysis.
    Vérard L, Allain P, Travère JM, Baron JC, Bloyet D.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct 30; 16(5):610-6. PubMed ID: 9368116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional facial scans.
    Gwilliam JR, Cunningham SJ, Hutton T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct 30; 28(5):408-15. PubMed ID: 16901962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pre- and postoperative MR brain imaging with automatic planning and scanning software in tumor patients: an intraindividual comparative study at 3 Tesla.
    Nelles M, Gieseke J, Urbach H, Semrau R, Bystrov D, Schild HH, Willinek WA.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep 30; 30(3):672-7. PubMed ID: 19711417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. MRI-based surface-assisted parcellation of human cerebellar cortex: an anatomically specified method with estimate of reliability.
    Makris N, Schlerf JE, Hodge SM, Haselgrove C, Albaugh MD, Seidman LJ, Rauch SL, Harris G, Biederman J, Caviness VS, Kennedy DN, Schmahmann JD.
    Neuroimage; 2005 May 01; 25(4):1146-60. PubMed ID: 15850732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An introduction to anatomical ROI-based fMRI classification analysis.
    Etzel JA, Gazzola V, Keysers C.
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul 28; 1282():114-25. PubMed ID: 19505449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.
    Ross AH, Williams S.
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul 28; 53(4):782-5. PubMed ID: 18537868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry.
    Douglas TS.
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Oct 28; 28(7):401-9. PubMed ID: 15464879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
    Hisley KC, Anderson LD, Smith SE, Kavic SM, Tracy JK.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan 28; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Skull stripping based on region growing for magnetic resonance brain images.
    Park JG, Lee C.
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct 01; 47(4):1394-407. PubMed ID: 19389477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of healthy volunteers: pilot study results from the population-based SHIP study.
    Hegenscheid K, Kühn JP, Völzke H, Biffar R, Hosten N, Puls R.
    Rofo; 2009 Aug 01; 181(8):748-59. PubMed ID: 19598074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Software-guided standardization of manual landmark data in medical images.
    Prüm H, Gerigk L, Hintze C, Thieke C, Floca R.
    Z Med Phys; 2011 Aug 01; 21(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20888204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Three-dimensional deformation-based hippocampal surface anatomy, projected on MRI images.
    Gardner R, Hogan RE.
    Clin Anat; 2005 Oct 01; 18(7):481-7. PubMed ID: 16059928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Re-use of a multi-purpose knowledge corpus on cortex anatomy for educational purposes.
    Gibaud B, Dameron O, Morandi X.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003 Oct 01; 95():439-44. PubMed ID: 14664026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ, Devine J, Darwin BC, Liu W, van Eede M, Henkelman RM, Hallgrimsson B.
    J Anat; 2019 Jun 01; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.