These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
269 related items for PubMed ID: 19331502
21. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. Massaro DW, Venezky RL, Taylor GA. J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. Van der Haegen L, Brysbaert M, Davis CJ. Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of learning experience on bihemispheric processing. Yoshizaki K, Hatta T. Int J Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 115(7):923-34. PubMed ID: 16051540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual processing and infant ocular Latencies in the overlap paradigm. Blaga OM, Colombo J. Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1069-76. PubMed ID: 17087542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Orthographic Coding: Brain Activation for Letters, Symbols, and Digits. Carreiras M, Quiñones I, Hernández-Cabrera JA, Duñabeitia JA. Cereb Cortex; 2015 Dec; 25(12):4748-60. PubMed ID: 25077489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Letter string processing and visual short-term memory. Ktori M, Grainger J, Dufau S. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Dec; 65(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 21958206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect. Vitu F, Lancelin D, Marrier d'Unienville V. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1220-49. PubMed ID: 17924819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Testing the flexibility of the modified receptive field (MRF) theory: evidence from an unspaced orthography (Thai). Winskel H, Perea M, Peart E. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():55-60. PubMed ID: 24818534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Letter and symbol identification: No evidence for letter-specific crowding mechanisms. Castet E, Descamps M, Denis-Noël A, Colé P. J Vis; 2017 Sep 01; 17(11):2. PubMed ID: 28862710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Serial probe recognition performance by a rhesus monkey and a human with 10- and 20-item lists. Sands SF, Wright AA. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Oct 01; 6(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 7430954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Häikiö T, Bertram R, Hyönä J, Niemi P. J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Feb 01; 102(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 18538339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage. Scaltritti M, Balota DA. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct 01; 144(2):397-410. PubMed ID: 24012723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The visual basis of category effects in object identification: evidence from the visual hemifield paradigm. Låg T, Hveem K, Ruud KP, Laeng B. Brain Cogn; 2006 Feb 01; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16182424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of children's identity and position processing for letter, digit, and symbol strings: A cross-sectional study of the primary school years. Schubert T, Badcock N, Kohnen S. J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Oct 01; 162():163-180. PubMed ID: 28605697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Recall of letters from the left and right visual half-fields under unilater and bilateral presentation. Hines D. Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr 01; 42(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 1272699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition? Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M. Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul 01; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of stimulus duration and inter-letter spacing on letter-in-string identification. Marzouki Y, Grainger J. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May 01; 148():49-55. PubMed ID: 24486806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Optimal Viewing Position effect in the lower visual field. Yao-N'dré M, Castet E, Vitu F. Vision Res; 2013 Jan 14; 76():114-23. PubMed ID: 23159419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]