These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


314 related items for PubMed ID: 19342258

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L, Baltes D, Bordy JM, Cutarella D, Delaunay F, Gouriou J, Leroy E, Ostrowsky A, Beaumont S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 21; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax I.
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct 21; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation code for coupled electron-photon transport.
    Jia X, Gu X, Sempau J, Choi D, Majumdar A, Jiang SB.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun 07; 55(11):3077-86. PubMed ID: 20463376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A deterministic partial differential equation model for dose calculation in electron radiotherapy.
    Duclous R, Dubroca B, Frank M.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul 07; 55(13):3843-57. PubMed ID: 20571208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison between PENELOPE and electron Monte Carlo simulations of electron fields used in the treatment of conjunctival lymphoma.
    Brualla L, Palanco-Zamora R, Wittig A, Sempau J, Sauerwein W.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep 21; 54(18):5469-81. PubMed ID: 19706962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V, Manser P, Frei D, Volken W, Schmidhalter D, Hirschi L, Fix MK.
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May 21; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
    Panettieri V, Wennberg B, Gagliardi G, Duch MA, Ginjaume M, Lax I.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul 21; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A, Vanetti E, Albers D, Brink C, Clivio A, Knöös T, Nicolini G, Cozzi L.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar 07; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX, Cygler JE, Yu CW, Kalach NI, Daskalov G.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct 01; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of transverse magnetic fields on dose distribution and RBE of photon beams: comparing PENELOPE and EGS4 Monte Carlo codes.
    Nettelbeck H, Takacs GJ, Rosenfeld AB.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 21; 53(18):5123-37. PubMed ID: 18723929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
    Panettieri V, Duch MA, Jornet N, Ginjaume M, Carrasco P, Badal A, Ortega X, Ribas M.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan 07; 52(1):303-16. PubMed ID: 17183143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. PENLINAC: extending the capabilities of the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE for the simulation of therapeutic beams.
    Rodríguez ML.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4573-93. PubMed ID: 18678929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
    Li JS, Shahine B, Fourkal E, Ma CM.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar 07; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
    Mukumoto N, Tsujii K, Saito S, Yasunaga M, Takegawa H, Yamamoto T, Numasaki H, Teshima T.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct 01; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
    Fotina I, Winkler P, Künzler T, Reiterer J, Simmat I, Georg D.
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec 01; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Radiation transport calculations for 50 MV photon therapy beam using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4.
    Larsson S, Svensson R, Gudowska I, Ivanchenko V, Brahme A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec 01; 115(1-4):503-7. PubMed ID: 16381775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.