These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
158 related items for PubMed ID: 19344883
1. Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):625.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19344883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Jacob CE, Pasquier JC. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 202(4):e10-1; author reply e11. PubMed ID: 20022585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Siddiqui M, Goldszmidt E, Fallah S, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Carvalho JC. Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 17766602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss. Baksu A, Kalan A, Ozkan A, Baksu B, Tekelioğlu M, Goker N. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Mar; 84(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 15715535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. Nafisi S. Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Apr; 16(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 17276669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine incision and maternal morbidity after cesarean section for delivery of the very low birthweight fetus. Druzin ML, Hutson JM, San Roman G. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 2756460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Blood loss at time of cesarean section by method of placental removal and exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision. Magann EF, Dodson MK, Allbert JR, McCurdy CM, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Oct; 177(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 8211584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section. Galaal KA, Krolikowski A. Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Double-blind, randomized comparison of the effect of carbetocin and oxytocin on intraoperative blood loss and uterine tone of patients undergoing cesarean section. Boucher M, Horbay GL, Griffin P, Deschamps Y, Desjardins C, Schulz M, Wassenaar W. J Perinatol; 1998 Apr; 18(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 9659650 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]