These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


163 related items for PubMed ID: 19345121

  • 21. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
    Sala M, Comas M, Macià F, Martinez J, Casamitjana M, Castells X.
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model.
    Krug KB, Stützer H, Girnus R, Zähringer M, Gossmann A, Winnekendonk G, Lackner K.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 17242248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA, Yaffe MJ.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
    Kitahama H.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May 25; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Schmid A, Imhoff K, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2003 Jun 25; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Ge J, Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Zhou C, Wu YT, Paramagul C, Zhang Y.
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun 25; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
    Hendrick RE, Cole EB, Pisano ED, Acharyya S, Marques H, Cohen MA, Jong RA, Mawdsley GE, Kanal KM, D'Orsi CJ, Rebner M, Gatsonis C.
    Radiology; 2008 Apr 25; 247(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 18372463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Film-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence.
    Powell KA, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA, Barry MM, Ganobcik SN, Cardenosa G.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct 25; 173(4):889-94. PubMed ID: 10511142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Broeders MJ.
    Radiology; 2009 Nov 25; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
    Skaane P, Skjennald A.
    Radiology; 2004 Jul 25; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
    McLaughlin CT, Neal CH, Helvie MA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct 25; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Ideguchi T, Higashida Y, Kawaji Y, Sasaki M, Zaizen M, Shibayama R, Nakamura Y, Koyanagi K, Ikeda H, Ohki M, Toyofuku F, Muranaka T.
    Radiat Med; 2004 Oct 25; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP, Williams C, Gill D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct 25; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.