These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 19348144

  • 1. [Selection of contrast media: current status of understanding].
    Briguori C.
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2009 Feb; 10(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 19348144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Calvo MV, Pilar del Val M, Mar Alvarez M, Domínguez-Gil A.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Effects on vasomotor tone and hemostatic function of radiologic contrast media used during invasive cardiological procedures].
    De Caterina R, Limbruno U.
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):1047-52. PubMed ID: 10514967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP, Thrall JH, Shetty PC.
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Hemodynamic effects of contrast substances as dependent on their viscosity and osmolality].
    Amosov VI, Shimanovskiĭ NL.
    Angiol Sosud Khir; 2004 Nov; 10(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 15627135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Parfrey PS, Barrett BJ.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul 16; 327(3):204-5. PubMed ID: 1608421
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S.
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec 16; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Flow rates of roentgen contrast media of different viscosity in 4.1 Charrière coronary catheters].
    Jung F, Schmitt RM, Scheller B, Bach R, Heidmann D, Spitzer S, Schieffer H.
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Aug 16; 85(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 8975493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Viscosity of iodinated contrast agents during renal excretion.
    Jost G, Lengsfeld P, Lenhard DC, Pietsch H, Hütter J, Sieber MA.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov 16; 80(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 21376497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contrast medium use.
    Davidson C, Stacul F, McCullough PA, Tumlin J, Adam A, Lameire N, Becker CR, CIN Consensus Working Panel.
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Sep 18; 98(6A):42K-58K. PubMed ID: 16949380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.