These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


486 related items for PubMed ID: 19386521

  • 1. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M, Rigali PH, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile.
    Cheung LK, Chan YM, Jayaratne YS, Lo J.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):e56-73. PubMed ID: 21665497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A, Khajeh S, Khavid A.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G, Garagiola U, Dominici A, Periti G, de Nardi S, Carletti V, Farronato D.
    Prog Orthod; 2010 Sep; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G, Carey JP, Flores-Mir C, Secanell M, Hart A, Lagravère MO.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB, Çakan DG, Arun T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME, Hollender LG, Chen CS, Moraes LC, Balducci I.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Morphometry of the cranial base and the cranial-cervical-mandibular system in young patients with type II, division 1 malocclusion, using tomographic cone beam.
    Bedoya A, Landa Nieto Z, Zuluaga LL, Rocabado M.
    Cranio; 2014 Jul; 32(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 25000162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.