These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

308 related items for PubMed ID: 19391631

  • 1. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs.
    Corbeil CR, Moitessier N.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 19391631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 1. Development and validation of FITTED 1.0.
    Corbeil CR, Englebienne P, Moitessier N.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Apr; 47(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 17305329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
    Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R.
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr 04; 267(3):727-48. PubMed ID: 9126849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD, Jewsbury PJ, Essex JW.
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct 04; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking.
    Thomsen R, Christensen MH.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jun 01; 49(11):3315-21. PubMed ID: 16722650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB, Thompson DC, Rai BK, Baber JC, Fan KY, Hu Y, Humblet C.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun 01; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    Kontoyianni M, McClellan LM, Sokol GS.
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan 29; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.
    Plewczynski D, Łaźniewski M, Augustyniak R, Ginalski K.
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar 29; 32(4):742-55. PubMed ID: 20812323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. SODOCK: swarm optimization for highly flexible protein-ligand docking.
    Chen HM, Liu BF, Huang HL, Hwang SF, Ho SY.
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jan 30; 28(2):612-23. PubMed ID: 17186483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand.
    Mizutani MY, Tomioka N, Itai A.
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Oct 21; 243(2):310-26. PubMed ID: 7932757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.