These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

427 related items for PubMed ID: 19393401

  • 1. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
    Halpin C, Rauch SD.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.
    Halpin C, Thornton A, Hasso M.
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8194681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical implications of a damaged cochlea: pure tone thresholds vs information-carrying capacity.
    Halpin C, Rauch SD.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Apr; 140(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 19328332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Two experiments on subtle mid-frequency hearing loss and its influence on word discrimination in noise-exposed listeners.
    Humes LE, Schwartz DM, Bess FH.
    Audiology; 1979 Oct; 18(4):307-19. PubMed ID: 475663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Towards understanding the specifics of cochlear hearing loss: a modelling approach.
    Stenfelt S.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S10-5. PubMed ID: 19012107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
    Gabriel D, Veuillet E, Vesson JF, Collet L.
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, Van de Heyning P.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aided air conduction threshold as a predictor of cochlear reserve in otosclerosis patients.
    Abdelghaffar H, Fakhry S, Fawzy T.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010 Jan; 72(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 20145423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The Vibrant Soundbridge System: a new kind of hearing aid for sensorineural hearing loss. 1: Function and initial clinical experiences].
    Lenarz T, Weber BP, Mack KF, Battmer RD, Gnadeberg D.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 May; 77(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 9644671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB, Kompis M.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders].
    Dieroff HG, Mangoldt W.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Development of audiologic symptoms in Ménière disease].
    Baumgarten D, Reker U, Müller-Deile J.
    HNO; 1984 Aug; 32(8):330-3. PubMed ID: 6332804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH, Ho HC, Wu HP.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [New aspects of hearing aid fitting].
    Schorn K, Brügel FJ.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jan; 73(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8141956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Hearing in advanced age: critical view of so-called presbycusis].
    Schultz-Coulon HJ.
    HNO; 1985 Jan; 33(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 3972643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Speech Intelligibility Index and the pure-tone average as predictors of lexical ability in children fit with hearing AIDS.
    Stiles DJ, Bentler RA, McGregor KK.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):764-78. PubMed ID: 22223888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.
    Ito A, Fukuda S, Shimozawa M, Abe K, Kumada J, Nakaya M.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Feb; 50(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 35643884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech recognition as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
    Vinay, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):542-53. PubMed ID: 17622189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.