These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 19394493

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of a novel ureteral occlusion device.
    Sarkissian C, Paz A, Zigman O, Webster K, Tamir I, Monga M.
    Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 22608800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A randomized prospective controlled study for assessment of different ureteral occlusion devices in prevention of stone migration during pneumatic lithotripsy.
    Farahat YA, Elbahnasy AE, Elashry OM.
    Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 20970173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model.
    Lukasewycz S, Hoffman N, Botnaru A, Deka PM, Monga M.
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):435-8; discussion 438. PubMed ID: 15351559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preventing retrograde stone displacement during pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi using lidocaine jelly.
    Mohseni MG, Arasteh S, Alizadeh F.
    Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):505-7. PubMed ID: 17010727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Antiretropulsion devices.
    Cabrera FJ, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME.
    Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Mar; 24(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24418744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of laser insult on devices used to prevent stone retropulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
    Vejdani K, Eisner BH, Pengune W, Stoller ML.
    J Endourol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):249-51. PubMed ID: 19220084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF, El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, El-Tabey NA, El-Hefnawy AS, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, El-Kappany HA, Sheir KZ.
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Accidental destruction of stone trapping baskets: new knowledge on the interaction of baskets, stone trapping devices, guide wires and lithotriptors - a brief review].
    Cordes J, Sommerauer M, Laturnus JM, Jocham D.
    Aktuelle Urol; 2013 Jul; 44(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 23818242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.