These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 1940537

  • 1. Longitudinal study of combined orthodontic and surgical treatment of Class II malocclusion with deep overbite.
    Jäger A, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Luhr HG.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 1940537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
    de Coul FO, Oosterkamp BC, Jansma J, Bierman MW, Pruim GJ, Sandham A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Vertical and sagittal relapse following surgical-orthodontic correction of distal bite position. Cephalometric longitudinal study].
    Richter U, Richter F, Klein J, Michel C.
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1990 Apr; 22(4):461-79. PubMed ID: 2101816
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Kaczynski R, Shunock M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S, Murakami K, Morishige Y, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D, Ferri J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
    Eggensperger N, Smolka K, Luder J, Iizuka T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
    Thüer U, Ingervall B, Vuillemin T.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994 Jan; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F, Robiony M, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001 Jan; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cephalometric evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Schatz JP, Tsimas P.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995 Jan; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9082005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stability after surgical-orthodontic corrective of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Proffit WR, Phillips C, Turvey TA.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991 Jan; 6(4):211-25. PubMed ID: 1820406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Surgical options in deep-bite mandibular deficiency with prominent chin - aesthetic considerations.
    Mommaerts MY, Shteif M, Hendrickx K, Laster Z.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 14980593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Correction of skeletal Class II--anterior deep bite and prominent chin by forced surgical rotation of the mandible.
    Mommaerts MY, López-Arcas JM, Schurmans AM.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 20170993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Alteration of the mandibular plane during sagittal split advancement: short- and long-term stability.
    Frey DR, Hatch JP, Van Sickels JE, Dolce C, Rugh JD.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 17428696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The stability of bimaxillary osteotomy after correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Ayoub AF, Stirrups DR, Moos KF.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993 Aug; 8(3):155-70. PubMed ID: 8301164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Stability of the mandible after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in 50 patients.
    Nakajima T, Kajikawa Y, Tokiwa N, Hanada K.
    J Oral Surg; 1979 Jan; 37(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 281471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.
    Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 11298310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Combined maxillary and mandibular midline and mandibular ramus distraction osteogenesis for treatment of a Class II patient with implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Takahashi I, Kawamura H, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 20197182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
    Angle AD, Rebellato J, Sheats RD.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.