These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1083 related items for PubMed ID: 19407025

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T, Tawara A.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I, Patsea E, Chatzimichali K, Skouriotis S, Chalkidou S, Amariotakis G, Papakonstadinou D, Theodossiadis G, Amariotakis A, Georgopoulos G.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Wang J, Cayer MM, Descovich D, Kamdeu-Fansi A, Harasymowycz PJ, Li G, Lesk MR.
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP.
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can mean central corneal thickness and its 24-hour fluctuation influence fluctuation of intraocular pressure?
    Fogagnolo P, Capizzi F, Orzalesi N, Figus M, Ferreras A, Rossetti L.
    J Glaucoma; 2010 Aug; 19(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19661818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.