These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
172 related items for PubMed ID: 19411554
21. Precaution, institutions, incentives, heuristics, regulation and hormesis: comments on 'Hormesis in precautionary regulatory culture: models preferences and the advancement of science'. Morris J. Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 26(11):851-3; discussion 875-6. PubMed ID: 18042579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries. Perko T, Zeleznik N, Turcanu C, Thijssen P. Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):614-25. PubMed ID: 22570920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Science, precaution, and the politics of technological risk: converging implications in evolutionary and social scientific perspectives. Stirling A. Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():95-110. PubMed ID: 18469218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The hormesis concept and risk assessment: are there unique ethical and policy considerations? Hoffmann G, Stempsey W. Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Aug; 27(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 19029257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: the role of risk perception and risk communication. Rogers MB, Amlôt R, Rubin GJ, Wessely S, Krieger K. Int Rev Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 19(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 17566905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Will nanotechnology make the world a better place? Parr D. Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):395-8. PubMed ID: 15967522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Perceiving others' perceptions of risk: still a task for Sisyphus. Finkel AM. Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():121-37. PubMed ID: 18469220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Hormesis: public health policy, organizational safety and risk communication. Poumadère M. Hum Exp Toxicol; 2003 Jan; 22(1):39-41; discussion 43-9. PubMed ID: 12643303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Progress in cancer care: the hope, the hype, and the gap between reality and perception. Saltz LB. J Clin Oncol; 2008 Nov 01; 26(31):5020-1. PubMed ID: 18794538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Communicating about xenotransplantation: models and scenarios. de Bruin WB, Güvenç U, Fischhoff B, Armstrong CM, Caruso D. Risk Anal; 2009 Aug 01; 29(8):1105-15. PubMed ID: 19508450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Different concepts of risk -- a challenge for risk communication. Hampel J. Int J Med Microbiol; 2006 May 01; 296 Suppl 40():5-10. PubMed ID: 16524781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk perception and risk communication. Finset A. Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jan 01; 82(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21168990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hazard perception, risk perception, and the need for decontamination by residents exposed to soil pollution: the role of sustainability and the limits of expert knowledge. Vandermoere F. Risk Anal; 2008 Apr 01; 28(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 18419656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]