These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits. Grant KW, Elhilali M, Shamma SA, Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Summers V. Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The robustness of hearing aid microphone preferences in everyday listening environments. Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Grant KW, Summers V, Dittberner AB. J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 May; 18(5):358-79. PubMed ID: 17715647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile. Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests. Wu YH, Bentler RA. Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments. Amlani AM, Rakerd B, Punch JL. Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference. Surr RK, Walden BE, Cord MT, Olson L. J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Jun; 13(6):308-22. PubMed ID: 12141388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions. Mackenzie E, Lutman ME. Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss. Wolfe J, Duke M, Schafer E, Jones C, Rakita L. J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting. Neher T, Wagener KC, Fischer RL. J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids. Chung K, McKibben N, Mongeau L. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations. Park HS, Moon IJ, Jin SH, Choi JE, Cho YS, Hong SH. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 8(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 26330918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer. Wolfe J, Duke M, Schafer E, Jones C, Rakita L, Battles J. J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference. Walden BE, Surr RK, Grant KW, Van Summers W, Cord MT, Dyrlund O. J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):662-76. PubMed ID: 16515138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]