These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 19421111

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
    Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Zafrani B, Guinebretière JM, Tardivon AA, Le Gal M, Vanel D, Neuenschwander S, Arriagada R.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996 Jul; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
    Fuchsjäger MH, Helbich TH, Ringl H, Funovics MA, Rudas M, Riedl C, Pfarl G.
    Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, Gröschel T, Richter C, Burmeister H, Kaiser WA.
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.
    Friedlander LC, Roth SO, Gavenonis SC.
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 21900618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.