These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

320 related items for PubMed ID: 19434824

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Flexophore, a new versatile 3D pharmacophore descriptor that considers molecular flexibility.
    von Korff M, Freyss J, Sander T.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 18393490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comprehensive comparison of ligand-based virtual screening tools against the DUD data set reveals limitations of current 3D methods.
    Venkatraman V, Pérez-Nueno VI, Mavridis L, Ritchie DW.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec 27; 50(12):2079-93. PubMed ID: 21090728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN, Abagyan RA.
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar 12; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Novel approach to structure-based pharmacophore search using computational geometry and shape matching techniques.
    Ebalunode JO, Ouyang Z, Liang J, Zheng W.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr 12; 48(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 18396858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. FLAP: GRID molecular interaction fields in virtual screening. validation using the DUD data set.
    Cross S, Baroni M, Carosati E, Benedetti P, Clementi S.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug 23; 50(8):1442-50. PubMed ID: 20690627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. FieldScreen: virtual screening using molecular fields. Application to the DUD data set.
    Cheeseright TJ, Mackey MD, Melville JL, Vinter JG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov 23; 48(11):2108-17. PubMed ID: 18991371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 1. Method and assessment of virtual screening.
    Liu X, Jiang H, Li H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep 26; 51(9):2372-85. PubMed ID: 21819157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance evaluation of 2D fingerprint and 3D shape similarity methods in virtual screening.
    Hu G, Kuang G, Xiao W, Li W, Liu G, Tang Y.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May 25; 52(5):1103-13. PubMed ID: 22551340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of a novel scoring method based on solvent accessible surface area descriptors.
    Núñez S, Venhorst J, Kruse CG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr 26; 50(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 20356089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Multiple-ligand-based virtual screening: methods and applications of the MTree approach.
    Hessler G, Zimmermann M, Matter H, Evers A, Naumann T, Lengauer T, Rarey M.
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct 20; 48(21):6575-84. PubMed ID: 16220974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
    Kinnings SL, Jackson RM.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep 20; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.