These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1150 related items for PubMed ID: 19435635

  • 1. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH, Reeder R, Hyun JK.
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA, Crawford GH, Lu DW, Kantor J, Margolis DJ.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A, Reeder R, Hyun J.
    J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M, Spong CY, Simonsen SE, Martin S, Scott JR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C, Drolet P, Girard M.
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Sep; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals.
    Redman BK, Merz JF.
    Account Res; 2006 Sep; 13(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 17124760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors.
    Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Niemeyer CM, Antes G, von Elm E.
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2010 Mar; 164(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20194261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
    Henly SJ, Bennett JA, Dougherty MC.
    Nurs Outlook; 2010 Mar; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
    Erb HN.
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec 01; 97(3-4):165-74. PubMed ID: 20951447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quality of medical journals with special reference to the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal.
    Aly AM.
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan 01; 25(1 Suppl):S18-20. PubMed ID: 14968186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 58.