These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


574 related items for PubMed ID: 19438937

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Feb; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Apr; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Apr; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG, Mazaro JV, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG, dos Santos PH.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants.
    Aguilar ML, Elias A, Vizcarrondo CE, Psoter WJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 20362763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.