These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

574 related items for PubMed ID: 19438937

  • 21. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Compagnoni MA, Molo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA, de Avila ÉD, Amaral ÂL, Pinelli LA, de Assis Mollo F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jun; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Jun; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG, Cardoso A, Gomes EA, Tabata LF, dos Santos PH.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF, Barboza EP, Gouvêa CV, Bianchini GM, Mussallem F, Carvalho WR.
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P, Lal K, White GS, Weber HP, Gallucci GO.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Feb; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
    Assunção WG, Tabata LF, Cardoso A, Rocha EP, Gomes EA.
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Sep; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Sep; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An in vitro study.
    Kaur T, Singla S, Kumar L.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023 Sep; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The suitability of head-of-implant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant-retained three unit bridges: an in vitro study.
    Bartlett DW, Greenwood R, Howe L.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 12526273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials.
    Enkling N, Bayer S, Jöhren P, Mericske-Stern R.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 19793332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A, Pelekanos S.
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.