These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

574 related items for PubMed ID: 19438937

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Monzavi A, Momen-Heravi F.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A.
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Mar; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12705035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE, Gardner FM, Nelson SK, Pashley DH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
    Jemt T, Bäck T, Petersson A.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999 Sep; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.