These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

624 related items for PubMed ID: 19438944

  • 1. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
    Chen X, Yuan J, Wang C, Huang Y, Kang L.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Sep; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL.
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
    Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Apr; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
    Widmann G, Zangerl A, Keiler M, Stoffner R, Bale R, Puelacher W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA, Zöller JE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Research on computer-aided technology of surgical guide for dental implant].
    Wu T, Liao W, Dai N, Wang P, Chen N.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21485172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
    Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Calasso S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Feb; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
    Zhao XZ, Xu WH, Tang ZH, Wu MJ, Zhu J, Chen S.
    Chin J Dent Res; 2014 Apr; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.
    Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
    Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review.
    D'Souza KM, Aras MA.
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):643-52. PubMed ID: 21905915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Navigated implant placement using a bone supported CT-guided surgical template. Case report].
    Teubner E, Rohner D, Deak A, Lorenzon A, Marinello CP.
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009 Oct; 119(12):1211-34. PubMed ID: 20120091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases.
    Sarment DP, Al-Shammari K, Kazor CE.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Jun; 23(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 12854779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.