These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 19443709

  • 1. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences.
    Purewal S, van den Akker OB.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 19443709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review.
    Platts S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones B, Parikh R, Thum MY.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30982353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
    Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari AM, Söderström-Anttila V.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr 01; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Attitudes and intentions towards volunteer oocyte donation.
    Purewal S, van den Akker OB.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2009 Apr 01; 19 Suppl 1():19-26. PubMed ID: 19622246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep 01; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation.
    Van den Broeck U, Vandermeeren M, Vanderschueren D, Enzlin P, Demyttenaere K, D'Hooghe T.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2013 Sep 01; 19(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23146866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review.
    Indekeu A, Dierickx K, Schotsmans P, Daniels KR, Rober P, D'Hooghe T.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2013 Sep 01; 19(6):714-33. PubMed ID: 23814103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.
    Pennings G, de Mouzon J, Shenfield F, Ferraretti AP, Mardesic T, Ruiz A, Goossens V.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May 01; 29(5):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24626802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G, Janson PO, Tägnfors U, Bergh C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar 01; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Caughey LE, Lensen S, White KM, Peate M.
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Dec 01; 116(6):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 34452749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Exploring motivations, attitudes and experiences of oocyte donors: A qualitative study.
    Borgstrøm MB, Nygaard SS, Danielsen AK, Kesmodel US.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug 01; 98(8):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 30779111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism.
    Purewal S, van den Akker OB.
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Dec 01; 64(1-3):43-9. PubMed ID: 16427244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Attitudes and intention to donate oocytes for research.
    Purewal S, van den Akker O.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar 01; 93(4):1080-7. PubMed ID: 19135662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
    Yee S, Blyth E, Tsang AK.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec 01; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden.
    Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Bergh T, Lundkvist O.
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Oct 01; 18(10):2205-15. PubMed ID: 14507845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [How is the Czech oocyte donor? The analysis of their profile].
    Rumpíková T, Oborná I, Bělašková S, Rumpík D.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017 Oct 01; 82(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29020785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.