These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique. Lee DG, Lee SH, Park SJ, Kim ES, Chung SS, Lee CS, Eoh W. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):E198-203. PubMed ID: 23511650 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Ito Z, Matsuyama Y. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug 15; 32(18):1980-5. PubMed ID: 17700444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec 15; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty versus French-door laminoplasty in cervical compressive myelopathy. Nakashima H, Kato F, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Ito K, Machino M, Ishiguro N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr 15; 39(8):642-7. PubMed ID: 24503689 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec 15; 31(26):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 17172996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun 15; 28(12):1258-62. PubMed ID: 12811268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical outcome in 520 patients and technique description. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 May 15; 26(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 22105107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, Mochizuki M, Moriya H. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb 15; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recovery process following cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical compression myelopathy: prospective cohort study. Suzuki A, Misawa H, Simogata M, Tsutsumimoto T, Takaoka K, Nakamura H. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec 15; 34(26):2874-9. PubMed ID: 19949366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study. Wang LN, Wang L, Song YM, Yang X, Liu LM, Li T. Int Orthop; 2016 Jun 15; 40(6):1267-74. PubMed ID: 27087625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can elderly patients recover adequately after laminoplasty?: a comparative study of 520 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr 15; 37(8):667-71. PubMed ID: 21912325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical analysis of C5 nerve root palsy in hinge side and different angles in lamina open-door after expansion of open-door cervical laminoplasty]. Sun T, Zhang H, Lu S, Li H, Yu B, Zhang X. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov 15; 25(11):1285-9. PubMed ID: 22229177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]