These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

377 related items for PubMed ID: 19447001

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Marr JT.
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Re: A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    Olgun ZD, Atilla B.
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):499; author reply 499. PubMed ID: 20171046
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Harato K, Bourne RB, Victor J, Snyder M, Hart J, Ries MD.
    Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 18325770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Can high-flexion tibial inserts improve range of motion after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?
    Crow BD, McCauley JC, Ezzet KA.
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep 07; 33(9):667. PubMed ID: 20839712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Primary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of American and Japanese cohorts.
    Iorio R, Kobayashi S, Healy WL, Cruz AI, Ayers ME.
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2007 Sep 07; 16(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 18053397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].
    Gacon G, Coillard JY, Barba L, Travers V.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995 Sep 07; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL, Schirm AC, Jeffcote BO, Kuster MS.
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov 07; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Recurrent dissociation of the tibial insert after mini-subvastus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a case report.
    In Y, Sur YJ, Won HY, Moon YS.
    Knee; 2011 Dec 07; 18(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20833051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Influence of the tibial slope on tibial translation and mobility of non-constrained total knee prosthesis].
    Migaud H, De Ladoucette A, Dohin B, Cloutier JM, Gougeon F, Duquennoy A.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996 Dec 07; 82(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8762983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Midterm results of primary total knee arthroplasty using a dished polyethylene insert with a recessed or resected posterior cruciate ligament.
    Sathappan SS, Wasserman B, Jaffe WL, Bong M, Walsh M, Di Cesare PE.
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct 07; 21(7):1012-6. PubMed ID: 17027544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Achieving deep flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Tarabichi S, Tarabichi Y, Hawari M.
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb 07; 25(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 19106030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.
    Parsley BS, Conditt MA, Bertolusso R, Noble PC.
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep 07; 21(6 Suppl 2):127-31. PubMed ID: 16950074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hi-flexion and gender-specific designs fail to provide significant increases in range of motion during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
    Song EK, Park SJ, Yoon TR, Park KS, Seo HY, Seon JK.
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun 07; 27(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 22115763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
    Sierra RJ, Berry DJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct 07; 23(7 Suppl):20-3. PubMed ID: 18701240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
    Vavrík P, Landor I, Tomaides J, Popelka S.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb 07; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.
    Chaudhary R, Beaupré LA, Johnston DW.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec 07; 90(12):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19047702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.