These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1270 related items for PubMed ID: 19448222

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
    Poolman RW, Struijs PA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Lutz KH, Bhandari M.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep 11; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr 11; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The quality of randomized controlled trials in major anesthesiology journals.
    Greenfield MLVH, Rosenberg AL, O'Reilly M, Shanks AM, Sliwinski MJ, Nauss MD.
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun 11; 100(6):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 15920210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
    Dumbrigue HB, Jones JS, Esquivel JF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec 11; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
    Scales CD, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P.
    J Urol; 2007 Mar 11; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of bias in methodology for randomized controlled trials published on implant dentistry.
    Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, Ng CC, Wakefield CW.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Mar 11; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16827739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
    Dulai SK, Slobogean BL, Beauchamp RD, Mulpuri K.
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Mar 11; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 64.