These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
32. Validity of the SenseWear Armband to assess energy expenditure in graded walking. Vernillo G, Savoldelli A, Pellegrini B, Schena F. J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 24508986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Hand-held indirect calorimeter offers advantages compared with prediction equations, in a group of overweight women, to determine resting energy expenditures and estimated total energy expenditures during research screening. Spears KE, Kim H, Behall KM, Conway JM. J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 May; 109(5):836-45. PubMed ID: 19394470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking. Leenders NY, Nelson TE, Sherman WM. Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jan; 24(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 12582951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+ and BodyMedia SenseWear Armband to estimate energy expenditure during physical activity and sport. Gastin PB, Cayzer C, Dwyer D, Robertson S. J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Mar; 21(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 28797831 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Poor agreement between a portable armband and indirect calorimetry in the assessment of resting energy expenditure. Bertoli S, Posata A, Battezzati A, Spadafranca A, Testolin G, Bedogni G. Clin Nutr; 2008 Apr; 27(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 18276043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]